How to win a nuclear war
Many say that nuclear war cannot be won, however this is not
the case, it just depends on exactly what you consider
winning to mean.
Let’s consider a simple model of two countries A and B, with three different target sets: leadership, nuclear weapons, and population.
In the following three scenarios only the initial attack and
the immediate response will be considered for simplicity, in reality there may
be multiple waves of strikes from either side.
let’s first consider country A attacking the population of
country B.
This would leave country B with its weapons intact to launch
a full-scale retaliation against the population, leadership, and weapons of
country A.
This exchange would result in vast numbers of people dead
for no gain whatsoever, therefore, this is something that no sane leader would
ever consider ordering.
The goal is to prevent the leadership of country B from being able to use their nuclear weapons without needing to target the weapons themselves.
However, this is easier said than done as many countries
have put systems in place specifically to prevent this from happening, such as
building underground command bunkers and mobile command posts.
Thirdly let’s consider country A launching a disarming
strike against country B, the goal is to prevent country B from being capable
of launching a retaliatory strike and therefore forcing its surrender on the
attackers’ terms.
However, if the initial strike does not successfully destroy all of its targets, then country B will be able to retaliate against the nuclear forces and leadership of country A.
These were simple illustrations of how nuclear war could
theoretically be fought however the best option is to pursue peaceful
coexistence with any adversary countries if at all possible.
Comments
Post a Comment